Ok, I must admit I have never been one to sit around and
play video games all day. I recall when
the first game system came out which I believe was Atari. Since that time there have been many others,
PlayStation, x-box, kinect, etc. . . . I have never owned any of these gaming
systems. I have played, and enjoyed
immensely, Pac-Man, Tetris, Centipede, and Galaxian at arcades, amusement parks,
and movie theatres; but to play them for hours on end . . . no. These
particular games, which are probably nothing like the ones discussed by Gee, I
found relaxing – a nice way to unwind and mildly engaging. So a lot of what elements that were covered in
the assigned readings or the Ted video, I cannot relate to personally. But I do know of family members and friends (youth
and adult men) who spend a lot of time playing video games, and now on-line
games where they play with others (people whom they often have never met)
throughout the US. It is astounding how this
area continues to expand.
Willingham (2009), in his book Why Don’t Students Like School? Talks about how we as humans are what
I term, “lazing thinkers”. He states
that when possible we do not think we work from memory, drawing upon prior
experience. He goes on to say that humans
enjoy thinking, however if there is a problem that requires too much thinking
or too little thinking we do not do it. These
notions explain why lots of people spend lots of money on video games – video
games that Gee describes as hard, long and complex in his article, “Good Video
Games And Good Learning.” Like Willingham,
Gee talks about the games meeting the perfect balance – they cannot be too hard
or too easy otherwise people would not buy them.
I love reading about everyone's thoughts on the gaming reading/video because it is so amazing to me. I can't decide whether the material that Jane talked about is just a theoretical idea that sounds amazing but would never really work with humans, or whether it is actually a legendary solution to the world's problems. I mean, you talked a lot about how Jame discusses the fact that people use video games to escape real life. I remember that, and is part of the reason why I feel like these video games to cure the world would never work. If humans want to turn to their video game as a getaway, are they really going to play a game that is a simulation of real life? They want to play something like Mario World or Grand Theft Auto where they can vicariously take on a new persona and take crazy dream-like risks. There is a significant part of me that thinks that Jane's video games totally defeat the purpose of video games, so no one is never going to want to play something like those ones.
ReplyDeleteBut then I start to think about games like Zoo Tycoon which is a lot more like real life. This game is awesome, because you have to apply real life Zoo settings and factors in order to be successful. Half the fun is dealing with the real-life problems and issues that arise when building a zoo. These kinds of games give me hope for McGonigal and her somewhat crazy ideas about video games. They make them seem genius! I honestly am just fascinated by how torn I am about what I think about her research, and so I enjoy reading what others think about the topic.
Everyone's thoughts on gaming are so interesting, this was my favorite topic of the term just because it was interesting and relatable. I agree with what you are saying about video games relating to teaching in that the subjects can not be too easy or too hard. In my homework study for 695 it was shown that student performance went down when the difficulty went up. Difference between video games and teaching is that we liked to be challenged in video games, it keeps us going. We use different knowledge to solve problems and make strategies. If only that was easy to transfer over to make students want to learn challenging problems from our teaching!
ReplyDelete