I sense a lot of bitterness and tension in the author of Dumbing
Down. He seems to think that the replacement
of the word “computing” with IT (Information Technology) is somehow degrading
the field. I disagree totally! I think the name change shows just how much technology
has evolved. Computing sounds much more
like a mathematical term or calculation and is, in my opinion limiting. It in no way reflects the kaleidoscopic view of
technology. There are many aspects to IT
that some people may not realize. I
believe that there are people who only attribute IT to computer games, iPods,
iPhones, GPS, Vehicles, computer hardware.
However, IT covers anything that processes data. The information scanned during checkout at
the grocery store, the information that is collected when performing automated
payments via telephone, any and every on-line transaction that is conducted are
just a few examples of the data handling perspective of IT. The information that is collected via these
means has to be stored somewhere for future data retrieval. How that information is collected,
transmitted, stored, retrieved and maintain is all a part of IT. In addition, there is another side of IT that
involves the testing and debugging of applications and systems created by
programmers. Quality Testing is done in
a methodical manner. It is not typically
done haphazardly. This is another side
to IT. With the continued expansion of
this Industry, there may be a chance that the name will have to change again!
The author also seems to believe that training students on
software such as MS PowerPoint and Excel provide meaningless secretarial
skills. I disagree again! Excel alone
can be used for budgeting, programing, graphing, and processing advanced calculations,
just to name a few. In addition, PowerPoint
is used heavily in the Educational and Business worlds for presenting. Therefore, I cannot see how providing
instruction on these tools can possibly be seen as meaningless.
The author mentions a quote by Seymour Papert that has
gotten me to thinking: ““Does the child program the computer or does the
computer program the child?” It is kind of like, “Which came first? The chicken or the egg?” type of deal.
When the author stated: “Isn’t it odd that technology
directors are not held accountable for such failure over three decades? Could they
possibly be enabling co-dependent behavior and helplessness in the teachers
they are meant to lead?” It reminded me of the learned helplessness that is a
cognitive functioning deficit experienced by individuals with MR. If the author
were aware of that I am sure he would have LOVED to use that in his blog J.
Moving along to the articles about the Soda Ban,
it is mentioned, “we tend to consume what’s put in front of us.” This comment somewhat suggests to me that the
writer believes we just behave instinctively rather than act based on our own free
will. The types of food choices made by
many of us are the results of our own decisions. What we all need to be are educated
consumers of our food intake. Think
about what we are eating and the nutritional value (if any) that our body is
receiving from the food. The society in
which we live is all about getting more, which more often than not leads to excess. I have on occasion gotten wrapped up in this same
ideal when, for example, posed with the question on whether or not I want to
supersize my grilled chicken combo meal at Wendy’s. Or when at the movie theatre and presented
with the option of upgrading my popcorn for just a few cents more which will give
me access to free refills. Now how many
times do you leave the movie that you are watching that you have paid $10+ to
see to go get more popcorn? Me? NEVER.
So why would I get this upgrade?
My mother used to always tell me to think before I speak. This is an area that I am STILL working
on. But we as a nation need to think before
we EAT!